Bitunix vs Bybit Fees Leverage Comparison: Which Exchange Actually Saves You Money?
Choosing between Bitunix and Bybit comes down to one question: where do your trading dollars go the furthest? Both exchanges attract futures traders with competitive fee schedules, high leverage, and deep liquidity pools. But the details matter, especially when you're running dozens of trades per week. This bitunix vs bybit fees leverage comparison breaks down exactly what each platform charges, what leverage they offer, and where each one pulls ahead.
Here's what the numbers actually look like when you put both platforms next to each other.
Fee Structures: Bitunix vs Bybit Side by Side
Fees eat into profits faster than most traders realize. A 0.01% difference sounds tiny until you compound it across hundreds of positions.
Bitunix futures fees: 0.006% maker / 0.06% taker at the base tier. Spot trading sits around 0.01-0.08% depending on the pair and volume tier.
Bybit futures fees: 0.02% maker / 0.055% taker for non-VIP users. Spot trading is a flat 0.1% for both makers and takers at the base level.
The gap is significant on the maker side. Bitunix charges roughly one-third of what Bybit does for limit orders on futures. If you're the type of trader who places limit orders and waits for fills (and you should be), Bitunix saves you real money over time. On the taker side, the two platforms are close, with Bybit actually slightly cheaper at 0.055% versus Bitunix's 0.06%.
Both platforms offer VIP tiers that reduce fees based on trading volume. Bybit's VIP program is more established, with maker fees dropping to 0.0% at the highest tiers. Bitunix's tiered discounts are competitive but the VIP structure is less transparent in its documentation.
Want the Lowest Futures Fees in the Game?
Trade with maker fees as low as 0.006% on Bitunix - plus up to $5,500 in welcome bonuses for new users.
Leverage Options: 125x vs 100x and What That Means
Bitunix offers up to 125x leverage on selected futures contracts, primarily BTC and ETH perpetuals. Bybit caps most contracts at 100x, though some reports suggest certain products can go higher.
Here's the thing about leverage comparisons: the maximum number matters less than most people think. Trading at 125x versus 100x is the difference between a 0.8% move and a 1% move wiping out your position. Neither is a responsible way to trade with real money. The practical range for most traders is 3x to 20x, and both platforms handle that range well.
Where leverage differences actually matter is in position sizing calculations. Higher available leverage means you can open the same position size with less margin locked up, freeing capital for other trades. A trader using 10x on Bitunix versus 10x on Bybit won't notice any difference. But having the option to go to 125x gives slightly more flexibility in how you allocate margin across multiple positions.
Both platforms support cross margin and isolated margin modes. If you're newer to futures, isolated margin is the safer choice since it limits your loss to the margin assigned to that specific trade.
Trading Products and Asset Coverage
Bybit wins on breadth. The platform lists thousands of trading pairs across spot and derivatives, covers options trading, and offers features like grid bots, dual asset investments, and a launchpad for token sales. If you want everything under one roof, Bybit delivers.
Bitunix is more focused. It covers 300 to 400 assets across spot, futures, and P2P trading. No options contracts, no USDC-denominated futures. But the assets it does list tend to include niche altcoins that sometimes aren't available on Bybit. The platform also has a solid copy trading feature that lets newer traders mirror experienced ones.
For pure futures traders who stick to BTC, ETH, and the top 20 altcoins, either platform has what you need. The product gap only matters if you want options or highly specialized derivatives.
125x Leverage on BTC and ETH Perpetuals
Open an account in under 2 minutes and get up to $5,500 in trading bonuses. No minimum deposit required.
Security and Regulation
Bitunix is registered with FinCEN in the United States and FINTRAC in Canada. It publishes Proof of Reserves, uses cold wallet storage for the majority of funds, and requires 2FA. For a newer exchange (founded 2021), the regulatory positioning is solid.
Bybit, founded in 2018 by Ben Zhou, has a longer track record. The platform uses multi-signature cold wallets, publishes regular Proof of Reserves audits, and maintains substantial emergency funds. Bybit has weathered multiple market crashes without incident, which counts for something in an industry where exchanges have disappeared overnight.
Neither platform has experienced a major hack. Both require KYC for full feature access, though Bitunix is known for more flexible verification policies.
User Experience and Platform Design
Bitunix leans toward simplicity. The interface is clean, navigation is straightforward, and placing a futures trade takes fewer clicks than on most competitors. New traders can get comfortable quickly. The mobile app mirrors the web experience without losing functionality.
Bybit's interface is denser. There's more information on screen, more tools available, and more customization options. Professional traders who want detailed charting, API access, and institutional-grade order types will appreciate the depth. But it comes with a steeper learning curve.
The best platform depends on what stage you're at. If you're placing your first leveraged trade, Bitunix's simplicity is genuinely helpful. If you've been trading for years and want granular control, Bybit's tools are hard to beat.
Bitunix vs Bybit Fees Leverage Comparison: The Verdict
Pick Bitunix if: You want the lowest possible maker fees on futures, prefer a clean interface, trade primarily BTC and ETH perpetuals, or want built-in copy trading. The 125x max leverage and lower base fees make it particularly attractive for active futures traders focused on the major pairs.
Pick Bybit if: You need options trading, want access to thousands of trading pairs, prefer a more established platform with a longer track record, or plan to use advanced features like grid bots and institutional APIs. The VIP fee tiers can eventually undercut Bitunix for very high-volume traders.
For most futures traders reading this, the honest answer is that both platforms work well. The fee difference at base tier favors Bitunix on maker orders by a meaningful margin. But Bybit's ecosystem is broader and its VIP program rewards loyalty. Try both with small positions and see which one fits how you actually trade.